C1049
エビデンスに基づく健康政策とコミュニケーション
EVIDENCE BASED HEALTH POLICY, MANAGEMENT AND COMMUNICATION 		特設科目
Special Seminars
2 単位
実施形態 完全オンライン
開催日程 秋学期 木曜日４時限
担当教員 國枝 美佳（クニエダ ミカ）
関連科目 前提科目（関連）: B1001,B6153,C1022,B3204
開講場所 SFC
授業形態 講義、実習・演習、グループワーク、遠隔あり
履修者制限

履修人数を制限する

受入学生数（予定）：約 15 人
選抜方法：課題提出による選抜

【課題内容】
Submit a max 2 page essay on why you would like to take this course. Suggested contents are: where you are coming from, where you are heading, your thoughts on health equity, why you think health policy and communication are important, and what you are expecting from this course. Deadline September 28th 17:00.

◯エントリー〆切日時：2020年9月28日（月） 17:00
◯履修許可者発表日時：2020年9月30日（水） 17:00

◯ファイル登録

Only the selected students can take this course.

Number of students in the class (scheduled) : About 15
Pre-registration screening by submitted an assignment

【ASSIGNMENT】
Submit a max 2 page essay on why you would like to take this course. Suggested contents are: where you are coming from, where you are heading, your thoughts on health equity, why you think health policy and communication are important, and what you are expecting from this course. Deadline September 28th 17:00.

* Schedule: TBD
履修条件

 

 

An interest and willingness to "seek and critically appraise evidence so that they can maximize the chances that their efforts will be effective in helping people in need."
quote from the main textbook for this course by Allen Rubin and Jennifer Bellamy called Practitioner's Guide to Using Research for Evidence-Based Practice, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2012.

 
使用言語 English
連絡先 mkunieda@sfc.keio.ac.jp
授業ホームページ
同一科目

 

 
学生が利用する予定機材/ソフト等

Request ITC for Endnote software use and installation

 
設置学部・研究科 総合政策・環境情報学部
大学院プロジェクト名

 
大学院プロジェクトサブメンバー

 

 
ゲストスピーカーの人数 0
履修選抜・課題タイプ=テキスト登録可 false
履修選抜・選抜課題タイプ=ファイル登録可 true
GIGAサティフィケート対象 true
最終更新日 2020/07/19 16:53:25

科目概要

This is an introductory course on evidence-based policy with a focus on health. The focus of this course will be on how to read or analyze evidence. The goal of this course is strengthened "evidence literacy" to be able to contribute to (health and social) equity, through policies, program and project management and communication.

 

授業シラバス

主題と目標／授業の手法など

This class aims to provide future practitioners (you!) what you need to know about various research designs and methods so that you can: determine which interventions, programs, policies, and assessment tools are supported by the best evidence and find as well as critically appraise qualitative and quantitative research studies in seeking evidence to answer different kinds of evidence-based practice questions.

This course is part of the Health Science perspective at SFC and will focus on health related issues, but is open to anyone interested in evidence-based policy and practices.
Classes will be conducted in a graduate school- or advanced seminar-style which means a lot of reading and hands-on exercises.

 

教材・参考文献

Rubin, Allen;Bellamy, Jennifer. Practitioner's Guide to Using Research for Evidence-Based Practice. Somerset John Wiley & Sons Incorporated, 2012.
ISBN / ISSN:E-ISBN:9781118238806;ISBN:9781118136713

提出課題・試験・成績評価の方法など

Presentation of one chapter of textbook in class. Draft presentation must be shared with the lecturer at least one day before the class. (30%)

Participation in class discussions and exercises(20%)

Systematic Review (50%) (groupwork is preferred but individual themes are also welcome)

 

履修上の注意

You will be required to read one chapter and review the exercises of that chapter of the textbook even if you are not presenting. Some chapters from the middle to the end are long and may be difficult, so plan ahead.

If you are presenting a chapter of the textbook, send your draft presentation to the faculty-in-charge on Wednesday, the day before the presentation.

Group meetings on the Systematic Review will be held in-class but actual literature search, article reading, analysis and writing will require individual time out-of-class.

 

授業計画

第1回 Oct 8 Introduction to Evidence-Based Practice

 

Emergence of Evidence-Based Practice
Defining Evidence-Based Practice
Types of EBP Questions
Evidence-Based Practice Is Not Restricted to Clinical Decisions
Developing an Evidence-Based Practice Process Outlook
Easier Said Than Done

 

 

第2回 Oct 15 Steps in the EBP Process

 

Step 1: Question Formulation
Step 2: Evidence Search
Step 3: Critically Appraising Studies and Reviews
Step 4: Selecting and Implementing the Intervention
Step 5: Monitor Client Progress

 

 

第3回 Oct 22 Research Hierarchies: Which Types of Research are Best for Which Questions?

 

More Than One Type of Hierarchy for More Than One Type of EBP Question Qualitative and Quantitative Studies
What Types of Research Designs Apply to What Types of EBP Questions?

 

 

第4回 Oct 29 Criteria for Inferring Effectiveness: How Do we Know What Works?

 

Internal Validity
Measurement Issues
Statistical Chance
External Validity
Synopses of Research Studies
Exercise for Critically Appraising Published Articles

 

 

第5回 Nov 5 Critically Appraising Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

 

Advantages of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Risks in Relying Exclusively on Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Where to Start What to Look for When Critically Appraising Systematic Reviews What Distinguishes a Systematic Review From Other Types of Reviews?
What to Look for When Critically Appraising Meta-Analyses
Synposes of Research Studies

 

 

第6回 Nov 12 Critically Appraising Experiments

 

Classic Pretest– Posttest Control Group Design
Posttest-Only Control Group Design
Solomon Four-Group Design
Alternative Treatment Designs
Dismantling Designs
Placebo Control Group Designs
Experimental Demand and Experimenter Expectancies
Obtrusive Versus Unobtrusive Observation
Compensatory Equalization and Compensatory Rivalry
Resentful Demoralization
Treatment Diffusion
Treatment Fidelity
Practitioner Equivalence
Differential Attrition
Synopses of Research Studies

 

 

第7回 Nov 19 Critically Appraising Quasi-Experiments: Nonequivalent Comparison Groups Designs

 

Nonequivalent Comparison Groups Designs
Additional Logical Arrangements to Control for Potential Selectivity Biases Statistical Controls for Potential Selectivity Biases Pilot Studies
Synopses of Research Studies

 

 

第8回 Nov 19 Critically Appraising Quasi-Experiments: Time-Series Designs and Single-Case Designs

 

Simple Time-Series Designs
Multiple Time-Series Designs
Single-Case Designs
Synposes of Research Studies

 

 

第9回 Nov 26 Critically Appraising Nonexperimental Quantitative Studies

 

Surveys
Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Studies
Case-Control Studies
Synopses of Research Studies

 

 

第10回 Dec 3 Critically Appraising Qualitative Studies

 

Qualitative Observation
Qualitative Interviewing
Qualitative Sampling
Grounded Theory
Frameworks for Appraising Qualitative Studies
Mixed Model and Mixed Methods Studies
Synopses of Research Studies

 

 

第11回 Dec 10 Critically Appraising and Selecting Assessment Instruments

 

Qualitative Observation
Qualitative Interviewing
Qualitative Sampling
Grounded Theory
Frameworks for Appraising Qualitative Studies
Mixed Model and Mixed Methods Studies
Synopses of Research Studies

 

 

第12回 Dec 17 Monitoring Client Progress

 

Reliability
Validity
Sensitivity
Feasibility
Sample Characteristics
Locating Assessment Instruments
Synopses of Research Studies

 

 

第13回 What you Do and Don't Need to Know About Statistics When Critically Appraising Studies

 

Guest speaker
Why do we need Inferential Statistics? The Bottom Line
Commonly Used Tests of Statistical Significance

 

 

第14回 Dec 24 Presentation of Systematic Review

 

 

 

 

第15回 Systematic Review Groupwork

 

 

 

 

15回目に相当するその他の授業計画

Working in a group or individually, you will draft together a systematic review of a health-related topic , give brief updates (oral progress reports) during class (Oct-Dec) and present the results of the systematic review in either of the last 2 sessions of this class (Jan).